NEVER MIND THE ALPINISM, HERE’S TWIGHT & ROLLINS

I HAVE NO MEMORY OF EVER SEEING OR HEARING OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH CLIMBING AND PUNK ROCK – HENRY ROLLINS
INSIDE THE PUNK MUSIC SCENE OF THE LATE 20th CENTURY IT IS NOT HARD TO ASSUME THAT ALPINE CLIMBING WAS DISTANT AND IRRELEVANT. INTENSE SCENES CONSUME ALL THE OXYGEN THEY CAN GET, MOVE FAST AND ARE TOO SELF-ABSORBED WITH SURVIVING THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY TO WORRY WHAT IS OVER THE HORIZON, AND YET THE IMPACT WAS FELT CLEARLY BY CLIMBERS. JUST LIKE IT’S MUSICAL PARALLEL THEY WERE PUSHING FOR MORE INDEPENDENCE, ENGAGEMENT, CONSEQUENCE AND IMMEDIACY, AGAINST A DECADENT ESTABLISHMENT MORE CONCERNED WITH COMFORT THAN CHANGE. ‘PUNK’ MAY HAVE BEEN SIMPLY A ZEITGEIST WITH MUSIC AND CLIMBING SUBCULTURES AMONG FLUORESCENCES OF THE TIME, JUST AS THE LIBERTINE ALEISTER CROWLEY, THE ADVENTURERS SHIPTON & TILMAN, THE POST-WAR POLISH, FRENCH AND JAPANESE WHO WERE WILLING TO DIE FOR IT, AND THE WAVE OF CLIMBERS THAT INFILTRATED UNSUPERVISED REGIONS AFTER THE DEMISE OF SOVIETISM WERE PRODUCTS OF THEIR TIME.
WE SEE PARALLELS BETWEEN THE PUNK TRENDS THAT SUBVERTED STADIUM POP AND ALPINE STYLE EXPEDITIONS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INDUSTRIALISED MOUNTAINEERING, RIGHT DOWN TO THE DO-IT-YOURSELF AND FETISH GEAR, THE PRANKSTERISM, THE DISCIPLINE WITHOUT ORTHODOXY AND THE ECLECTIC PEDIGREE OF WEIRDOS. FEEDING THE RAT EXPEDITIONS OPENLY TRADES ON A PUNK ETHIC, OF PULLING THE TIGERS TAIL AND ADVOCATING DISSENT, BUT TO DO SO NEEDS MORE THAN HASHTAGS AND A SONG CLIP. RATHER THAN STUMBLING FORWARD FLOGGING AN IDIOM WE ONLY PLAY LIP SERVICE TO, WE CHOSE TO REFERENCE AS HIGH UP THE FOOD CHAIN AS WE COULD AND RISK AN ADMONISHING OR WORSE – BEING IGNORED – BUT AT LEAST WE KNOW WE ENGAGED THE PUNK ORACLES RATHER THAN JUST WORE THE T-SHIRT.
WE APPROACHED HENRY ROLLINS AND MARK TWIGHT FOR RESPONSES, BOTH BEING COMMENTATORS ON SUCH THINGS ACROSS THE DECADES. ROLLINS IS SOMEONE WE ANNOY EVER FEW YEARS TO TOUCH BASE WITH PUNKS PRAGMATIC COMPASS (AND BECAUSE LUX IS DEAD AND WE CAN’T GET GIBBY’S CONTACT), AND TWIGHT WE PROD OCCASIONALLY FOR ANYTHING WANTING THE OPINION OF AN ALPINE ELDER, RANGING FROM OBSCURE GEAR TO TRAINING, TO REVIEWS (EXTREME ALPINISM / ENDURANCE) AND MUSINGS.
BOTH WERE GENEROUS WITH THEIR INTENT AND DENSITY OF CONTENT, PUTTING WORDSMITHERY INTO OPINION AND DETAIL. ROLLINS IS STILL A POLITE PUNCH TO THE FACE WITH NEUTRON STAR-LIKE DENSITY TO HIS REPLIES, AND TWIGHT CAN STILL JOLT THE READER WITH TURNS OF PHRASE OUT FROM THE BLINDSPOTS, AND THOUGH IT’S EASY TO THINK BOTH CAN SOUND ‘RETRO’ AT TIMES, RECALL THESE ARE THE GUYS WHO DISTILLED WHAT BECAME THE MEMES AND CLICHES OF THEIR TRADES ONLY AFTER.
IT’S NO ACCIDENT TWIGHT AND ROLLINS INTERSECT HERE. WE HAVE BEEN ADHERENTS TO BOTH FOR DECADES WITH THEM FORMING PART OF FEEDING THE RAT EXPEDITIONS PERSPECTIVE FROM THE START; ROLLINS FROM THE BLACK FLAG GRAPHICS THAT MADE IT THROUGH TO US IN ZINES, AND TWIGHT AS THE GUY IN THE LURID, GLITCHY, PIRATED VHS FILMS WHO NEEDED A WALKMAN BUT NOT A HELMET – THIS WAS ALIEN CONTACT FROM A CULTURE FAR AWAY BEYOND THE ONE WE WERE BORED WITH. BOTH FRONT LARGE SPECTRUMS OF WORK ACROSS MULTIPLE MEDIUMS AND CHALLENGING REPERTOIRES THAT ANYONE INTO THE FTRE STYLE WOULD BE ENRICHED TO INVESTIGATE, AND BOTH HAVE BEEN AROUND THE BLOCK IN MEANINGFUL WAYS WHICH MATTERS A LOT – BECAUSE ANYONE CAN HAVE AN OPINION FROM INSIDE THE FISHBOWL WHEN IT IS ONLY THE OPINION FROM OUTSIDE LOOKING BACK IN THAT COUNTS. WHERE MANY OF THEIR CONTEMPORARIES ARE LIVING OFF MEMOIRS, GREATEST HITS, PUNDITRY OR ARE NO LONGER LIVING AT ALL, BOTH TWIGHT AND ROLLINS ARE CONTINUUMS OF REINVENTION AND ENERGY, WITH DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO WHEN BOTH PUNK ROCK AND ALPINISM WERE SERIOUS, DANGEROUS AND RADICAL.
…
THIS ARTICLE WENT THROUGH SEVERAL FORMATS, THOUGH THE INITIAL IDEA DIDN’T CHANGE – TO ILLUMINATE ANY OVERLAP OF PUNK AND ALPINISM WHERE BOTH WORDS ARE INTERCHANGEABLE. HERE, IN EVERY INSTANCE, PUNK CAN BE READ AS ALPINISM AND VICE VERSA. ROLLINS AND TWIGHT GOT EXACTLY THE SAME PROMPTS WHICH ARE NO MORE THAN VEHICLES FOR THE REPLIES. NEITHER WAS AWARE WHO THE OTHER CONTRIBUTOR WAS IN ORDER TO AVOID CONSENSUS – WE THINK IT’S A GREATER SIGN OF INTEGRITY THAT MULTIPLE ‘REALITIES’ CAN EXIST RATHER THAN ANY SINGLE ONE BE AGREED. WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET, THERE’S NOTHING IN THE ORDER THOUGH IT WASN’T CHANGED, AND THE ONLY CHANGES ARE A MINOR CLARIFICATION, ONE WORD FOR A BETTER ONE, AND A FOOTNOTE.
DOES IT WORK? WELL IF YOU THINK MORE, MAKE NEW CONNECTIONS AND ELUCIDATE IDEAS THEN IT DOES. IT’S AN EXPERIMENT, WHERE TWO MINDS THAT COULD PROBABLY SIT TOGETHER IN REAL SPACE SHARE A SPACE HERE AND AN OBJECT OF WILL IS PRODUCED. AND YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY – CLIMB WHAT THOU WILT, AND ALL THAT.
…

SEAN EVANGELISTA IMAGE WITH PERMISSION
PUNK AS A VERB AND PUNK AS A NOUN, WHAT DOES PUNK WANT?
HENRY ROLLINS I think initially, punk wanted a reaction.
MARK TWIGHT Punk as a verb got coopted by some group or idea and turned into a joke, practical or otherwise. As a noun … it could legitimately have about a dozen entries in its dictionary definition, all of which point to counter-cultural, I suppose. What does punk itself want? To be nourished so it may flourish. Left alone it destroys itself because, human nature. Proper counter-cultural revolution isn’t just destruction but the creativity that follows. Or better yet the creativity that makes destruction unnecessary.
THE ROLE OF ANARCHY IN PUNK
HR I think it was more a word that got thrown around than a concept that was explored. At the end of the day, a lot of punk rockers ended up being pretty bourgeois, so the anarchy concept was just that–a concept, something to say, but not a concept to be truly embraced.
MT In this context, for me, anarchy means freedom; freedom From and freedom To. In the mountains I could hold on or let go at any time. True autonomy. My body no longer belonged to the State. OK, it’s a bit dramatic, but it’s how I felt back then. I felt truly free, which is what it’s all about isn’t it? That said, boundaries and/or limitations sometimes allow greater freedom and creativity than a so-called free-for-all, both gravity and the big-ass bouncer at the door provide boundaries within which to operate and explore.
PUNK CULTURE. DOES IT TRANSFER?
HR I think it does. In 2025 you see it in “normal” people getting their hair, dyed colors, tattoos on bankers, etc. they might not know exactly where this kind of thing came from and that’s when you know that it’s a true transfer. It goes almost invisibly into culture.
MT It depends on the definition of punk and the openness of the minds and areas towards which such transferability is directed. If the main takeaway from the culture is DIY, do it yourself, do your own thing, ignore social norms and make your own, tear up the societal recipe and cook up your own life path yourself then yes, the culture and ideals are highly transferable to anyone with an appropriate temperament, and any activity human beings may undertake.
JUNKIES AND ATHLETES. WHY IS PUNK SO HARD ON THE BODY?
HR Depends on the punk, I think. There were many, who took drugs and drank alcohol, and to a certain extent destroyed themselves. Also, it’s not a frame of mind that is exactly achievement – oriented and the lifestyle is probably pretty hard on the internal organs. I always like the music and some of the ideas of punk rock, but not necessarily the lifestyle.
MT Hardcore ideals are expressed by way of hardcore physicality, which does indeed exact a price. The “no future” undercurrent at the origins of punk promote a “live fast, die young” attitude, if there’s no future to plan or prepare for then use it hard now. Alpinism is the same; if you’re going to die doing it or are likely to then chase the strongest possible experiences now, don’t hold anything in reserve.
WORK ETHIC. WHERE IS THE ENERGY SPENT?
HR For me, I prioritize my energies towards work projects that will have results I can use.
MT Ideally, as in according to the ideal, energy is spent making, not taking. Creating, not consuming.
COURAGE. WHAT DOES PUNK FEAR?
HR hopefully it fears complacency, mediocrity and compromise.
MT Confinement, a lack of oxygen, regulations that suppress expression (and this does not contradict the concept that some limits allow freedom stated above). The regulations that suppress are sometimes financial (excessive permitting fees in Himalayan region), political (regions closed — and sometimes rightfully so — to particular nationalities and activities), or based in fear and liability (mandatory use of supplemental O2 above certain elevations in China*), or the restricted vision of safety Nazis who feel entitled to manage risk for others according to their own tolerance of same. The Mountains and the Pit each demand some courage, not to mention writing and rehearsing and performing music or other art. Those who lack it should not be permitted to regulate those who do.
*THE WORST OF THE CLIMBING INDUSTRY AND BUREAUCRATIC INTERFERENCE COMBINED, 8000m PEAKS IN THE EVEREST REGION MUST USE SUPPLEMENTARY OXYGEN
ENVIRONMENT. WHAT IS PUNKS NICHE?
HR At this point, it’s as mainstream as any kind of music or youth movement.
MT Sticking with the theme, as an ideal punk is expressed everywhere, or can be. In sweaty basement music venues, in gyms, boxing clubs, speeding (self-powered) across unforgiving pavement, on the steepest mountains, the highest summits, austere deserts and wide open, near-freezing water; unnatural and natural environments. This is a literal answer but more interesting is to examine the internal environment where punk may thrive, grow, and mature — the open mind, the searching heart and soul, acceptance and also a lack of it, confrontation, and all (hopefully) transmuted into physical expression, into creation and meditation.
MEDIA AND LITERACY. WHAT PLATFORM CARRIES PUNK BETTER?
HR I wish it was literacy, but it’s always been media. Rock was sensationalized and quite often distorted by the media. Punks were seen as drooling, drug addicted, criminally minded monsters, and certainly some of them were, but that also describes a lot of policemen I’ve encountered in my life.
MT Any platform that is not founded on commerce may viably carry and broadcast the punk ideal. At its inception the internet was punk as fuck; anti-establishment, leveled playing field, open to all, just as punk was open to those who could barely play their instruments but had energy and curiosity and attitude. These days though, digital platforms reflect the majority of their users, feeding up if-you-like-this-you-may-like-this bullshit, algorithmic steering that only leads to homogeneity. Except in the Comments section, no platform ever offered a suggestion of if-you-like-this-you-should-take-a-long-hard-look-at-your-motivations-and-ask-yourself-why, it never offered the opposite or even a meaningful, tangential idea. All social media is designed to make people as much alike as possible, and turn them into both consumer and consumed. Physical art is different; the underlined text, the dog-eared page, the smell of ink or paint and the rustle of paper. Ephemeral art also matters; the hear-then-gone live show, the here-then-gone ice climb, things that may be experienced but not held or preserved, this is punk as fuck.
RISK. WHAT DOES PUNK CONFRONT?
HR Whatever you’ve got. Hopefully that somewhat arcane cinematic reference is not lost upon the reader.
MT It’s dangerous to step out of line. Punk confronts the notion of going along to get along and the consequence of that is social and financial; they don’t call hand and face tattoos “job-stoppers” for nothing. A punk must be willing (and able) to fight in defense of extreme ideas and opinions. Sure, there’s the performative, choreographed violence of the pit, but generally the risk there is that of accidental injury although some bands were known, not for the music necessarily, but for their excessively violent fans. On the other hand the alpinist punk must be willing to die in the act of expressing and experiencing an ideal. Never ask, “How light is too light?” if you’re not willing to learn and live with (or not) the answer. The punk ideal is self-knowledge and the alpinist uniquely positioned to test the validity of his or her knowledge and capability. Be honest or get dead.
AUDIENCE. WHO IS WATCHING AND HOW DO THEY AFFECT THINGS?
HR Quite often at punk shows, I go to, people seem to be watching the band through their phone. I’m not sure at this point what punk rock achieves.
MT These days everyone is watching, and an intolerably large percentage are performing for and seeking validation from whoever is watching. Dependence on extrinsic validation, especially from non-peers, is sickening and ultimately, devolutionary. Decisions are made by performers of all sorts according to the reaction provided by the audience; go too hard and you turn them off, be just marginal enough though and you can sell something. Audience always commoditizes the performer, eventually, which means art itself is compromised by excessive external influence.
WHAT KILLS PUNK?
HR Apathy. All cultural tributaries can dry up if ignored. all independent music scenes are the participant’s to lose.
MT A lack of creativity. Repetition. Waning energy. Sometimes maturity. Resistance-fatigue. Go your own way fatigue. The trappings of punk, the clothes, the behavior, especially when worn or done in a performative way, an outlandish look-at-me way, drives external intolerance, and while this doesn’t kill, it does suffocate. Political associations kill punk; the music is extreme, the climbing is extreme, stretching the edges of human experience, thus any political associations can be similarly extreme, whether left or right, anything too far into the margins will be dismissed. Intolerance kills an idea just as certainly as compromise. On the other hand, one of the best punk bands (Big Black) announced their break-up then recorded their greatest album. Like Zarathustra, they were brave enough to die at the right time, and to choose it.
…
MARK TWIGHT CAN BE FOUND AT https://substack.com/@marktwight
HENRY ROLLINS BROADCASTS AT https://www.henryrollins.com/radio
…